Plaintiff Jeanne Tarr’s motion for summary adjudication of Defendant Sequoia Equities, Inc.’s eighth and thirteenth affirmative defenses is denied. There are disputed issues of fact as to whether Defendant violated the Settlement Agreement and Release, specifically, paragraphs 2.2 and 3.6....
IRENE LOKE vs. PENNYMAC HOLDING
Defendants PennyMac Holdings, LLC, and PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust Holdings 1, LLC’s general demurrer to each cause of action within the First Amended Complaint is sustained without leave to amend. (Cal. Code Civ. Proc., section 430.10, subd. (e). See also,...
PG&E vs. BAILLIE COMMUNICATION
The motion by defendant Baillie Communications, Inc. (Baillie) for summary judgment is granted. There is no triable issue of material fact as to whether Baillie is liable for damages for accounts stated Pacific Gas & Electric Company’s (PG&E). Through its...
HANSON vs. SYCAMORE HEALTHCARE
Defendant’s motion for summary judgment is DENIED. Triable issues of fact exist as to each cause of action, as detailed below. Defendant’s Motion for Summary Adjudication is DENIED. Triable issues of material fact exist. They include: What the definition of...
BORG vs. JP MORGAN CHASE
Defendants JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. for itself and as Acquirer of Certain Assets and Liabilities from the FDIC as Receiver of Washington Mutual Bank and California Reconveyance Company’s general demurrer to each cause of action within the First Amended...
UJDUR vs. FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE
Defendant Fidelity Title Company of California’s motion for judgment on the pleadings is denied in part and granted in part. Defendant can bring a nonstatutory motion for judgment on the pleadings since the grounds for general demurrer are never waived....
CERF vs. CHEROKEE SIMEON
Appearance required. The parties should be prepared to address the following matters. The parties currently have multiple law and motion matters on calendar for hearing dates both before and after the March 16, 2015 trial date. It would appear that...
SAFE STEP WALK-IN vs. GREENWORKSUS
Plaintiff/Judgment Creditor Safe Step Walk-In Tub Co., a Tennessee Corporation’s Motion for an Assignment Order is granted. (Cal. Code Civ. Proc., sections 708.510 et seq.) The Court orders an assignment to Plaintiff/Judgment Creditor Safe Step Walk-In Tub Co., a Tennessee...
ROSS vs. VITAS HEALTHCARE
Defendant Stonebrook Convalescent Center, Inc.’s motion to strike is granted in part and denied in part. The motion to strike Paragraph 3 of the Prayer requesting $500 for each violation of Patient Rights by Defendants’ employees is granted without leave...
ROSS vs. VITAS HEALTHCARE
Defendant Stonebrook Convalescent Center, Inc.’s demurrer is overruled. The demurrer to the first cause of action for violations of patients’ rights pursuant to Health & Safety Code Section 1430(b) is overruled. Defendant has provided no authority for the proposition that...