Defendant County of Contra Costa’s demurrer, brought on its behalf and on behalf of its Employment & Human Services, Children & Family Services Unit, is sustained with leave to amend. Defendant demurs to the Fifth Cause of Action (Negligent Supervision—Gov....
ENEA VS. WELLS FARGO
Plaintiffs’ Application for Preliminary Injunction is granted for a period of 90 days, conditioned upon timely payments of all property taxes and insurance, plus monthly payments to Defendant Wells Fargo’s attorneys in the amount of $5,000.00. (Cal. Code Civ. Proc.,...
HERICH VS. SHIPP
Plaintiff’s Request for Interlocutory Relief is denied. The relief requested can now only be determined at trial after both sides have presented admissible evidence and the trier of fact determines whether Plaintiff has sustained his burden of proof or not. ...
HERICH VS. SHIPP
Defendant’s Motion to Compel Plaintiff to answer form interrogatories is granted. Plaintiff admits that he has failed to respond to the form interrogatories. The basis for Plaintiff’s failure to respond is that he believes the Defendants are not allowed...
HERICH VS. SHIPP
Defendant’s Motion to Compel Plaintiff to Respond to Request for Admissions is granted. Plaintiff admits that he has failed to respond to the Request for Admissions. The basis for Plaintiff’s failure to respond is that he believes the Defendants...
HERICH VS. SHIPP
Defendant’s Motion to Compel Plaintiff to Respond to Inspection Demand is granted. Plaintiff admits that he has failed to respond to the inspection demand. The basis for Plaintiff’s failure to respond is that he believes the Defendants are not...
POOL VS. ATCHISON VILLAGE
Defendant Atchison Village Mutual Homes Corporation’s Motion to Strike is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The motion is GRANTED as to the request for punitive damages (paragraph 2 of the prayer.) Disregarding conclusions, the SAC fails to...
PERREIRA VS. DENNING
Defendant John Denning II’s motion to strike is denied. Punitive damages may be awarded if a trespass is committed from malicious motives or reckless disregard of the rights of others. See Armitage v. Decker (1990) 218 Cal.App.3d 887, 907; Roth...
WIGHT VS. THE CITY OF LAFAYETTE
By this writ of administrative mandamus (Code of Civ. Proc., § 1094.5), Petitioners seek judicial review of the City Council of Lafayette’s May 11, 2015 approval of Resolution 2015-13. The petition is denied. Resolution 2015-13 denied Petitioner’s Phase II...
ZETTLE VS. MTC FINANCIAL, INC.
Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Add a Party Plaintiff is denied. Plaintiff has not complied with Cal Rules of Court, Rule 3.1324(a), (b). No supporting declaration accompanies the motion as required by CRC 3.1324(b). A separate declaration must accompany the...