California Tentative Rulings
Defendant’s Motion to Quash is DENIED. Plaintiff’s deposition subpoenas seek highly relevant information and are intended to trace the embezzled funds. The scope of discovery is broad, the information sought is directly relevant to the litigation and given the nature...
Plaintiffs’ and Defendants’ Motions to Enforce Settlement Agreement are DENIED. Parties’ motions clearly demonstrate that both parties are in breach and that the parties have abandoned their agreement. Lubin v. Lubin (1956) 144 Cal.App.2d 781, 796. These motions demonstrate that...
Dept: O XIA v. HATTAB ET AL Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Deposition is GRANTED pursuant to CCP §2025.450. Plaintiff noticed Defendant Hattab’s deposition twice, once for 1/28/15 and once for 3/4/15. See Plaintiff’s Exhibit D. On both occasions, Defense counsel...
Dept: O Private Label PC, Inc. v. PQI Corporation, et al. (KC062856) Specially Appearing Defendant Cheng Uei Precision Industry Co. Ltd.’s MOTION TO QUASH SERVICE OF SUMMONS AND THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT Respondent: Plaintiff Private Label PC, Inc. TENTATIVE RULING Specially...