The Court DENIES David Shiokari’s Motion to strike the entirety of Plaintiffs’ memorandum of costs. The Court PARTLY GRANTS AND PARTLY DENIES, the Motion to tax the challenged costs, as set forth below. Judicial notice is taken of the records...
Gonzalez VS Xia
Motion to Strike: The Motion to Strike brought by Cross-Defendants Seven Gables Real Estate Group, Inc. and James Jekums is DENIED with respect to ¶42 of the Cross-Complaint (included within the second cause of action) and ¶4 of the Prayer. The Motion...
Nunez v. Corona
Preliminary matter In Defendants’ evidentiary objections 1, 3, 29, 34, and 42, there is an objection that Defendants did not receive some of the exhibits within Plaintiff’s opposition papers. This asserted omission should have been a subject of a meet...
Morse v. Estate of Richard Nicholson
Having read and considered the supplemental briefs on the issue of the relation-back doctrine, the court maintains its earlier tentative ruling. The motion is GRANTED. The court finds that the fictitious defendant procedure of CCP §474 does not apply in...
Mendoza v Weiss
Defendants David Vaisz (“David” individually) and Sonja Vaisz (“Sonja” individually; “defendants” together with David) Amended Motion for Summary Judgment or Alternatively Summary Adjudication (“MSJ”) against plaintiffs SHOWFX, Inc. (“SHOWFX” individually) and Stephanie Mendoza (“Mendoza” individually; “plaintiffs” together) is DENIED. Defendants...
Slayton Vs City of Santa Ana
Pertinent Background Facts On 12/28/12, plaintiff Corey Slayton – an active duty member of the Santa Ana Police Department – responded to a radio call for help involving a suspect hiding underneath a vehicle. A K-9 officer was deployed to...
IMPAC Mortgage Corp. v. Silver Bay Funding Corp
A) Motion to Be Relieved As Counsel (“MBRC”) Defense counsel Bernard & Bernard’s (“Bernard”) Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel (“MBRC”) for defendant Silver Bay Funding Corp. (“Silver Bay”) is DENIED without prejudice. “The proposed order relieving counsel must be...
Kerns v. On Target Solutions, LLC
Defendant On Target Solutions, LLC’s Motion for Sanctions pursuant to CCP § 128.7 is denied. Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”) was unauthorized and is stricken. Under CCP § 128.7 a court may impose sanctions if a paper filed with the...
Pham v. Wilson
Motion to exclude expert
Shiokari v. Shiokari
Defendant David Shiokari’s Motion for an order modifying or amending the Court’s Receiver Order to delete the phrase “or to the Arbitrator,” from Paragraph 10 of the Receiver Order is granted pursuant to CCP §§ 473(d) and 128. The Defendant’s...