California Tentative Rulings
Plaintiff Sheri Moody asks the Court to reconsider its prior ruling on 12/13/18 on Plaintiff’s motion for judgment on the pleadings. A motion for reconsideration made by a party must be based on “new or different facts, circumstances, or law”...
Plaintiff Amy Dowell moves the court for an order quashing the deposition notice of non-party witness Karim Abdollahi, M.D. The motion is brought pursuant to California Rule of Court 3.1010(a), and Code of Civil Procedure §§2025.240 & 2025.270, because Plaintiff...
Defendant Altfillisch Contractors, Inc. demurs to the First and Second Causes of Action in the Complaint filed by Plaintiff Adam Corcoran based on the “workers compensation exclusivity rule” codified in Labor Code §§3600, 3602 and related case law. The Complaint...
Plaintiff FieldConnect, Inc. seeks reconsideration, under Code of Civil Procedure §1008(a), of the Court’s 12/06/18 order quashing service of summons on specially appearing Defendant Caldwell & Gregory, LLC based on lack of personal jurisdiction. Under Section 1008(a), when a motion...
Defendant James Welch moves “for a determination of the collateral estoppel effect of the July 18, 2017 ruling of Judge Taylor of the Bankruptcy Court of the Southern District of California and the United State District Court for the Southern...
Cross-Defendant One Stop Door Shop, Inc. (“One Stop”) seeks a good faith determination as to its settlement with Plaintiffs William A. Pond and Michaela Pond, and Defendants/Cross-Complainants Hayden Development, Inc. and Kyle Hayden. The Court must determine whether “the amount...
Plaintiff GXP Consultants Alliance, Inc. (“GXP”) seeks an order vacating the voluntary dismissal that it filed on 06/28/18, and the Court’s order awarding defendant Lacy Construction, Inc. (“Lacy”) attorney’s fees, entered 10/12/18. The motion seeks both mandatory and discretionary relief...
Defendants Pegah Fazeli and Farinoush Ghaneian seek a protective order limiting the number of depositions to be taken of them in their varying capacities, and limiting the time for said depositions in this matter. Defendants contend that a protective order...
Plaintiff Venessa Ruiz filed her Complaint on 1/19/16. On 6/16/18, the parties agreed to settle this case when Plaintiff accepted $110,000 from BMW, pursuant to its CCP 998 offer to compromise the action. As the prevailing party in this action,...
Defendants Warren Hennagin and Glenn M. Gelman & Associates move to compel non-party Tamborelli Law Group to provide further responses to certain categories of documents requested in Defendants’ business records subpoena served on 7/12/18. (Akinmurele Decl. at ¶ 5, Ex....