California Tentative Rulings
Shear Builders, Inc.’s Motion for Leave to File a Second Summary Adjudication is denied. Shear Builders, Inc.’s (“SBI”) motion does not comply with the requirements in either Code of Civil Procedure section 437c(f) or Code of Civil Procedure section 1008, makes...
Defendants Robert Higgins, Sharon Higgins, David Pratt, and Dimitar Dimitrov move to compel further responses to demands for inspection and copying. The parties lump the requests into two distinct groups, the first being items 5-8. In these, Defendants seek every...
Although the caption of Defendant’s motion to compel includes reference to request for production of documents, the notice of motion itself refers only to the first set of form interrogatories. Defendant’s motion to compel further responses to form interrogatories Nos....
Defendants move to compel production of documents from Plaintiff, and to produce an appraisal in connection with a demand for exchange of documents in connection with a disclosure of expert witnesses. The motion is interpreted as a motion to compel...
MCV-235365, Royal Petroleum Co. v. Windsor Concrete MCV-235365, Royal Petroleum Co. v. Windsor Concrete Plaintiff’s motion for order for publication of summons is continued to Fri., Sept. 18, 2015, at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom 17. Plaintiff shows that it...
Sonoma County SCV-254867 Judge Nadler Plaintiff’s motion for final approval of class action settlement is granted. Plaintiffs have served the notice as required and demonstrated that only four members have asked to be excluded while no member has objected, or...