California Tentative Rulings
The “Motion of defendants Lopez to Compel Further Responses” etc., filed on 4/4/19, is granted in part. The responses at issue appear adequate on their face. (See C.C.P. § 2031.220 [response that party will comply shall state that production “will...
The Plaintiff Balboa Capital Corp.’s has filed one motion seeking initial responses to Form Interrogatories, Set No. One, Special Interrogatories, Set No. One, and Inspection Demands, Set No. One from Defendants Jose M. Lozano, M.D., P.A. and Jose Lozano and...
1. Form Interrogatories Plaintiff’s Motion for an order compelling further responses to Form Interrogatory Nos. 3.7, 12.1, 12.2, 12.3, 12.7, 15.1, 16.1, 16.2, 16.3, 16.4, 16.5, 16.6, 16.9, and 16.10 is granted unless the defendant has provided further responses prior...
Plaintiff Ruben Castro Flores’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion to Compel Further Responses to Requests for Production, Set One (“Motion”) is GRANTED IN PART, and DENIED IN PART. To begin with, Plaintiff’s meet and confer efforts were not reasonable and in good faith....
The motion to compel deposition is granted. Every litigant has a legal obligation to comply with the provisions of the Civil Discovery Act, and this includes litigants who are represented by guardians. (Regency Health Services, Inc. v. Superior Court (1998)...
Motion to compel complete, verified, substantive, objection-free response to form interrogatories is GRANTED. Plaintiff is ordered to respond within 15 days. Plaintiff is further ordered to pay $569.95 in sanctions (2 hrs + filing fee). Motion to compel complete, verified,...
The Motion by Defendant/Cross-Defendant George C. Hopkins Construction Co, Inc. to Compel Further Responses from Defendant/Cross-Complainant Hardrock Management Corporation to Form Interrogatories-Construction Litigation (Set Two) is GRANTED. Each answer in the response to an interrogatory must be “as complete and...
The Motion by Plaintiff Estela Organista to compel Defendant to provide further responses to Plaintiff’s Form Interrogatories, Special Interrogatories, Requests for Production, and Requests for Admission is granted in part and denied in part. The motion is granted as to...
Plaintiff Amy Dowell moves the court for an order quashing the deposition notice of non-party witness Karim Abdollahi, M.D. The motion is brought pursuant to California Rule of Court 3.1010(a), and Code of Civil Procedure §§2025.240 & 2025.270, because Plaintiff...
he “Motion to Compel & Sanctions” filed by Plaintiff Ahmed Mandre is DENIED. No proof of service for the Motion has been submitted. Nor does it include the required meet and confer declaration. (See C.C.P. § 2016.040 and 2031.310(b)(2).) The...