Discovery motion granted and monetary sanctions imposed at $500 per hour
Membership required to view full tentative ruling content.
Log In Register today!
Log In Register today!
MS International, Inc. v. N & F Granite and Straight Fine Flooring, LLC
Motion to compel discovery responses granted with sanctions imposed
Membership required to view full tentative ruling content.
Log In Register today!
Log In Register today!
Petersen v American Building & Remodeling, Inc.
1. Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Further Responses to Special Interrogatories and For a Monetary Sanction of $1350.The motion of plaintiff Darren C. Petersen, as trustee of the Darren C. Petersen Living Trust, to compel defendant American Building & Remodeling, Inc., to...
Membership required to view full tentative ruling content.
Log In Register today!
Log In Register today!
Pham v. Wilson
Motion to exclude expert
Membership required to view full tentative ruling content.
Log In Register today!
Log In Register today!
Sardesai v. Giampietro
The $2,350 per hour for a treating physician’s deposition time appears, on its face, to be grossly excessive
Membership required to view full tentative ruling content.
Log In Register today!
Log In Register today!
MSI Office Furniture, LLC vs. Lopez
The “Motion of defendants Lopez to Compel Further Responses” etc., filed on 4/4/19, is granted in part. The responses at issue appear adequate on their face. (See C.C.P. § 2031.220 [response that party will comply shall state that production “will...
Membership required to view full tentative ruling content.
Log In Register today!
Log In Register today!
Balboa Capital Corp., VS Jose M. Lozano, M.D., P.A.
The Plaintiff Balboa Capital Corp.’s has filed one motion seeking initial responses to Form Interrogatories, Set No. One, Special Interrogatories, Set No. One, and Inspection Demands, Set No. One from Defendants Jose M. Lozano, M.D., P.A. and Jose Lozano and...
Membership required to view full tentative ruling content.
Log In Register today!
Log In Register today!
Hauser vs Zara Nails, Inc.
1. Form Interrogatories Plaintiff’s Motion for an order compelling further responses to Form Interrogatory Nos. 3.7, 12.1, 12.2, 12.3, 12.7, 15.1, 16.1, 16.2, 16.3, 16.4, 16.5, 16.6, 16.9, and 16.10 is granted unless the defendant has provided further responses prior...
Membership required to view full tentative ruling content.
Log In Register today!
Log In Register today!
Flores v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc.
Plaintiff Ruben Castro Flores’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion to Compel Further Responses to Requests for Production, Set One (“Motion”) is GRANTED IN PART, and DENIED IN PART. To begin with, Plaintiff’s meet and confer efforts were not reasonable and in good faith....
Membership required to view full tentative ruling content.
Log In Register today!
Log In Register today!
Deveney vs. St. Jude Hospital
The motion to compel deposition is granted. Every litigant has a legal obligation to comply with the provisions of the Civil Discovery Act, and this includes litigants who are represented by guardians. (Regency Health Services, Inc. v. Superior Court (1998)...
Membership required to view full tentative ruling content.
Log In Register today!
Log In Register today!