The $2,350 per hour for a treating physician’s deposition time appears, on its face, to be grossly excessive
Membership required to view full tentative ruling content.
Log In Register today!
Log In Register today!
MSI Office Furniture, LLC vs. Lopez
The “Motion of defendants Lopez to Compel Further Responses” etc., filed on 4/4/19, is granted in part. The responses at issue appear adequate on their face. (See C.C.P. § 2031.220 [response that party will comply shall state that production “will...
Membership required to view full tentative ruling content.
Log In Register today!
Log In Register today!
Hauser vs Zara Nails, Inc.
1. Form Interrogatories Plaintiff’s Motion for an order compelling further responses to Form Interrogatory Nos. 3.7, 12.1, 12.2, 12.3, 12.7, 15.1, 16.1, 16.2, 16.3, 16.4, 16.5, 16.6, 16.9, and 16.10 is granted unless the defendant has provided further responses prior...
Membership required to view full tentative ruling content.
Log In Register today!
Log In Register today!
Deveney vs. St. Jude Hospital
The motion to compel deposition is granted. Every litigant has a legal obligation to comply with the provisions of the Civil Discovery Act, and this includes litigants who are represented by guardians. (Regency Health Services, Inc. v. Superior Court (1998)...
Membership required to view full tentative ruling content.
Log In Register today!
Log In Register today!
Gonzalez vs. The Pizza Store
Motion to compel complete, verified, substantive, objection-free response to form interrogatories is GRANTED. Plaintiff is ordered to respond within 15 days. Plaintiff is further ordered to pay $569.95 in sanctions (2 hrs + filing fee). Motion to compel complete, verified,...
Membership required to view full tentative ruling content.
Log In Register today!
Log In Register today!
California Wholesale Material Supply, LLC vs. Hardrock Management Corporation
The Motion by Defendant/Cross-Defendant George C. Hopkins Construction Co, Inc. to Compel Further Responses from Defendant/Cross-Complainant Hardrock Management Corporation to Form Interrogatories-Construction Litigation (Set Two) is GRANTED. Each answer in the response to an interrogatory must be “as complete and...
Membership required to view full tentative ruling content.
Log In Register today!
Log In Register today!
Organista vs. Northgate Gonzalez, LLC
The Motion by Plaintiff Estela Organista to compel Defendant to provide further responses to Plaintiff’s Form Interrogatories, Special Interrogatories, Requests for Production, and Requests for Admission is granted in part and denied in part. The motion is granted as to...
Membership required to view full tentative ruling content.
Log In Register today!
Log In Register today!
Dowell vs. Target
Plaintiff Amy Dowell moves the court for an order quashing the deposition notice of non-party witness Karim Abdollahi, M.D. The motion is brought pursuant to California Rule of Court 3.1010(a), and Code of Civil Procedure §§2025.240 & 2025.270, because Plaintiff...
Membership required to view full tentative ruling content.
Log In Register today!
Log In Register today!
Taat vs. Fazeli
Defendants Pegah Fazeli and Farinoush Ghaneian seek a protective order limiting the number of depositions to be taken of them in their varying capacities, and limiting the time for said depositions in this matter. Defendants contend that a protective order...
Membership required to view full tentative ruling content.
Log In Register today!
Log In Register today!
Custom Goods, LLC v. Karma Automotive, LLC
Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Further Responses to Form Interrogatories Set One, numbers 12.1 to 12.4, 12.6 and 15.1 is GRANTED. Defendant must provide verified further responses by no later than January 18, 2019. Plaintiff is awarded $1,260 in discovery sanctions...
Membership required to view full tentative ruling content.
Log In Register today!
Log In Register today!