Motion for Reconsideration TENTATIVE RULING Motion for Reconsideration is DENIED. Even if the court, on its own motion, reconsidered the ruling and the amount of sanctions under LeFrancois v. Goel (2005) 35 Cal.4th 1094, 1096-1097 the court would issue the...
STEVEN DICKMAN ET AL VS. ARMED FORCES INSURANCE EXCHANGE
Motion for Reconsideration TENTATIVE RULING Motion for Reconsideration is DENIED. Even if the court, on its own motion, reconsidered the ruling and the amount of sanctions under LeFrancois v. Goel (2005) 35 Cal.4th 1094, 1096-1097 the court would issue the...
PARVIZ AFRAMIAN VS. JOHN O TAYLOR
(1) Order to Show Cause Re FAC and POS on FAC NOTICE OF POSTING OF TENTATIVE RULING AND TELEPHONIC SUBMISSION This tentative ruling is posted at 10:46 a.m. on 10/02/2015. If there are no parties who have appeared in the...
DAVIT GASPARYAN VS. MARINA DEMIRCHYAN ET AL
TENTATIVE RULING (1) Motion to Compel Further Responses to Form Interrogatories, Set One (served 4/1/2015) and Request for Monetary Sanctions. Motion is GRANTED as to Requests Nos. 2.3, 2.7 (as it relates to D and D Marketing), 15.1(b) and 17.1(d)....
LAYNE LESLIE BRITTON VS. CONRAD RIGGS ET AL
MOTION FOR TERMINATING SANCTIONS TENTATIVE RULING (1) Terminating Sanctions Conrad Riggs and Cloudbreak Entertainment, Inc.’s Motion for Terminating Sanctions is DENIED. The court does not exercise its inherent authority to dismiss the case on the basis of litigation misconduct as...
LAYNE LESLIE BRITTON VS. CONRAD RIGGS ET AL
MOTION FOR TERMINATING SANCTIONS TENTATIVE RULING (1) Terminating Sanctions Conrad Riggs and Cloudbreak Entertainment, Inc.’s Motion for Terminating Sanctions is DENIED. The court does not exercise its inherent authority to dismiss the case on the basis of litigation misconduct as...
TERRI CHUN VS. JUSTIN TAYLOR INC ET AL
(1) MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT (2) MOTION TO STRIKE (3) MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL TENTATIVE RULING Motion #1: The motion by Plaintiff to file her proposed First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) to add a PAGA cause...
GOLDEN BEST PLUMBING INC VS. TOUNI BAGHDASARIAN ET AL
TENTATIVE RULING Plaintiff’s motion for an award of attorney’s fees pursuant to CCP §§1032, 1033.5 and 1218 and CC §1717, for an award of attorney’s fees and costs (i.e., of $46,110.05 in fees and $1,218.05 in costs). This court’s 6/29/15...
RANI LYNN PAPPE VS. PETER J SOLIMON ET AL
TENTATIVE RULING ON THE DEMURRER As to the Requests for Judicial Notice, the court rules as follows: GRANTED as to Exhibit “A” (i.e., case docket in In Re Sandoval, et al., Case No.: 6:11-bk-20823-MJ; hereinafter, the “Sandoval BK); GRANTED as...
MAI D LE PHONG VS. LY THI DINH
MOTION FOR JUDGMENT NOV MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL TENTATIVE RULING – JNOV Motion for JNOV is DENIED. See discussion. DISCUSSION – JNOV Plaintiffs’ motion requests that the court find that after reviewing the evidence in the...