ENTER SEARCH TERM
(hit enter/return key to submit)
REFINE BY COUNTY › JUDGE
REFINE BY DATE
Wright vs Bank of America N.A.
1.Plaintiff Casas Jr.’s Motion to Consolidate 2.Defendant Nationstar Mortgage LLC’s Motion to Dismiss 1. Motion to Consolidate Ordinarily the only triable issue in an UD proceeding is the right to possession, along with any incidental damages that result from the...
Log In Register today!
Thomas vs. Allied Universal
Defendant Allied Universal’s motion to withdraw or amend deemed admissions as to plaintiffs Vanessa Thomas, et al., pursuant to C.C.P. § 2033.300(a), is DENIED. Defendant’s motion is in response to the Court’s November 5, 2018 Minutes Order (“11/5/18 Order”), which...
Log In Register today!
My Vape Order, Inc. v. Upchurch
Plaintiff My Vape Order, Inc.’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction Plaintiff My Vape Order, Inc. (MVO) moves for a preliminary injunction against Defendant Eric Upchurch. For the following reasons, Plaintiff’s motion is granted. In determining whether a preliminary injunction should issue,...
Log In Register today!
Taat vs. Fazeli
Defendants Pegah Fazeli and Farinoush Ghaneian seek a protective order limiting the number of depositions to be taken of them in their varying capacities, and limiting the time for said depositions in this matter. Defendants contend that a protective order...
Log In Register today!
Ruiz vs. BMW or North America, LLC
Plaintiff Venessa Ruiz filed her Complaint on 1/19/16. On 6/16/18, the parties agreed to settle this case when Plaintiff accepted $110,000 from BMW, pursuant to its CCP 998 offer to compromise the action. As the prevailing party in this action,...
Log In Register today!
Puga vs. Novus Dia, LLC
Defendants Warren Hennagin and Glenn M. Gelman & Associates move to compel non-party Tamborelli Law Group to provide further responses to certain categories of documents requested in Defendants’ business records subpoena served on 7/12/18. (Akinmurele Decl. at ¶ 5, Ex....
Log In Register today!
Custom Goods, LLC v. Karma Automotive, LLC
Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Further Responses to Form Interrogatories Set One, numbers 12.1 to 12.4, 12.6 and 15.1 is GRANTED. Defendant must provide verified further responses by no later than January 18, 2019. Plaintiff is awarded $1,260 in discovery sanctions...
Log In Register today!
RAHGOSHAY VS. PUGH
The moving defendants failed to faithfully discharge their statutory obligation to meet and confer prior to filing the pending demurrer. Pursuant to CCP §430.41(a), “the demurring party shall meet and confer in person or by telephone with the party who...
Log In Register today!
SANDERS VS. PEACOCK
1.MOTION TO QUASH SUBPOENA Plaintiff Ruby Sanders’ Motion for an order to Quash Defendant’s Subpoena to Dr. Cuthbert is Granted but only such that the challenged subpoena is limited to records from November 5, 2005 to the present. Plaintiff’s request...
Log In Register today!
D’ARCY VS. BLAKELY
1.MOTION FOR SLAPP This is a defamation action in which Plaintiff is an attorney. Defendant is someone with whom he has an ongoing grudge. This is defendant’s special motion to strike. Defendant Brett Schulte is alleged to have authored “the...
Log In Register today!