Motion for Summary Judgment or Summary Adjudication Plaintiff requests summary judgment in favor of plaintiff. In the alternative, Plaintiff requests summary adjudication as to the first through fourth and sixth causes of action. Plaintiff also seeks a decree foreclosing its...
Perez vs. City of Anaheim
Motion of Defendant City of Anaheim to Bifurcate. CCP 598 provides in pertinent part: The court may, when the convenience of witnesses, the ends of justice, or the economy and efficiency of handling the litigation would be promoted thereby, on...
Ralphs Grocery Company vs. Goldstein Ostic & Associates
1) MTC Further Responses to Form Rogs. 2) MTC Further Responses to Special Rogs. 3) MTC Further RFPD Responses 4) MTC Further Responses to RFAs 5) MTC Further RFPD Responses 1) The Ralphs plaintiffs’ motion to compel...
American Technologies, Inc. vs. Mirrafati
Demurrer to Cross Complainants 3rd Cause of Action for Fraud. Indirect Reliance Under the principle of indirect reliance, a fraudulent misrepresentation is actionable if it was communicated to an agent of the plaintiff and was acted upon by the agent...
Vaughan vs. Douroux
Request for Judicial Notice. Defendant Obdulia M. Douroux’s Request for Judicial Notice is GRANTED. Judicial notice is limited to the existence of, filing of, and the legal effect of the pleading, not as to the truth on any disputed factual...
Level 3 Construction, Inc. vs. Urban Commons Riverside Blvd., LLC
Level 3 Design Group, Inc. (hereinafter, Design) moves to strike the first amended complaint filed by Level 3 Construction Inc.,on the mistaken belief that plaintiff was required to obtain leave of court before filing it. Plaintiff was not. Code of...
Robert Clapper Construction Services, Inc. vs. J.P. Witherow Roofing Company
1. The court rules on Defendant’s Objections to Evidence as follows: Declaration of Mark Brown. 1-6 Sustained, hearsay. Declaration of Jacquie Warner 7-8 Sustained, hearsay, lack of foundation. 2. Defendant J.P. Witherow Roofing Company’s Motion...
Medina vs. Orange County Transportation Authority
1. Defendant Orange County Transportation Authority’s motion to compel the deposition of plaintiff Robert Medina is granted. Plaintiff Robert Medina shall appear for deposition at the Law Offices of Woodruff, Spradlin & Smart, APC, 555 Anton Boulevard, Suite 1200, Costa...
Smith vs. Yates
Defendant Toni Yater’s motion to quash the subpoenas by plaintiffs Wayne Smith and Corona Del Mar Properties for defendant’s banking records with Bank of America and Union Bank from June 1, 2010 to December 31, 2013 is GRANTED. (See CCP...
Assadi vs. Mohebbi
1. Defendant Fariba Azarli demurrer to the 1st and 4th causes of action of the Second Amended Complaint is sustained in its entirety. As to the first cause of action, Plaintiff has not alleged the fraud against this...