Cross-Defendant’s: Demurrer to Cross-Complaint Motion to Strike Portions of Cross-Complaint The court is inclined to sustain cross-defendants’ Demurrer to the 2nd cause of action (intentional interference with contractual relations) with 20-days leave to amend and to overrule the demurrer to...
Merchant Capital Source vs Tap House Grill
Defendants Tap House Grill Palatine LLC, an Illinois Limited Liability Company dba Tap House Grill Palatine, Robert Ward and Mark Zych’s Motion to Set Aside/Vacate Default and Judgment There is a very similar motion set for June 19. The court...
West Coast Private Investments vs FCI Lender Services
Defendant’s: 1. Demurrer to Complaint The court is inclined to OVERRULE the demurrers by defendant FCI Lender Services, Inc. to the Complaint filed by plaintiff West Coast Private Investments, LLC. Defendant failed to file the required declaration under Code of...
Bui vs Residential Credit Solutions
Defendants Residential Credit Solutions and The Bank of New York Mellon’s Demurrer to 2nd Amended Complaint The court is inclined to SUSTAIN without leave to amend Demurrer to the 4th and 6th causes of action in the Second Amended Complaint. ...
The Irvine Company vs Skorpion Inc
Plaintiff’s Motions: Defendant failed to respond to the discovery and failed to file an opposition to these motions explaining the failure to respond. Plaintiff is thus entitled to an order compelling responses and to sanctions. 1. Motion to Compel Answers...
West Coast Holdings vs Pearman Trust
Defendant’s Motion for Continuance of Trial Moving party did not file or serve this motion until 11-16-16, which is 11 court days prior to the hearing. Service was by mail. Per CCP § 1005(b), moving and supporting papers “shall be...
Mazroei vs Tanber
Plaintiff’s: It is unclear that there motions were filed timely, as the extension was not to a time certain as required by the code, except for the conditions for the alcohol license. Motion to Compel Answers to Special Interrogatories The...
Fire Insurance Exchange vs U.S. Quality Supply
Plaintiff’s: Motion to Compel Answers to Special Interrogatories The court is inclined to grant the motion by Plaintiff to compel defendant to provide further responses to RPDs, set one, Nos. 1-7, 1-21, 23-24, 26-30, and 32-22. The objections are overruled. ...
Secure Channels Inc vs Secure Channels, SA
Defendants Nexgen Applied Solutions and Robert Coleridge’s Motion to Quash Service of Summons The court is inclined to grant the motion by specially appearing defendants, Robert Coleridge and Nexgen Applied Solutions, Inc., a Nevada corporation doing business in the State...
Almquist vs MacKay
Plaintiff’s Motion to Consolidate The court is inclined to grant the motion by Dan Almquist for an order consolidating this case 30-2015-00803203 (Case No. 1) with the cases entitled Prime-M Services LLC v. Almquist, case no. 30-2015-00822497 (“Case No. 2”),...