MOTION TO VACATE DEFAULT   Granted, conditioned on compliance with CCP 473(b), filing of proposed responsive pleading.   The Request for Entry of Default was not properly served on COMM RELAY as the Proof of Service states it was served...

DEMURRER   Defendant Alexander Kim’s demurrer is overruled. Late reply to demurrer is not considered. MOTION TO STRIKE  Defendant Alexander Kim’s motion to strike is denied. Defendant Ahn Nguyen’s motion to strike is denied. Defendants to answer within 10 days....

MOTION “TO ENFORCE COURT ORDER”   Denied. The basis of the motion does not appear to be any outstanding discovery issues, but rather some violation of Judge Wilson’s Order to pay attorney’s fees and costs associated with the withdrawn RFAS....

MOTION TO QUASH  Granted, as Plaintiff failed to meet her burden of establishing sufficient facts to justify the exercise of jurisdiction. (See Vons Companies, Inc. v. Seabest Foods, Inc. (1996) 14 Cal.4th 434, 449) The entirety of Plaintiff’s evidence is...

DEMURRER AND JOINDERS  Unopposed.  Defendant Dana Park’s Demurrer to the Complaint is sustained, in its entirety, as to the 8th Cause of Action. The 8th cause of action for violation of certain Government Code sections fails to state a claim...

DEMURRER  Overruled, with 10-days to Answer. The Demurrer is not accompanied by a Meet and Confer Declaration as required by CCP § 430.41. However, on the merits, the Demurrer to the 2nd, 3rd and 5th causes of action for fraudulent...

PITCHESS MOTION  Granted, pursuant to Evidence Code §1043.  The Court finds “good cause” for the production sought and, consequently, will proceed to an in camera hearing, as required by Evidence Code §1045 immediately following this motions calendar (and before any...

CLAIM OF EXEMPTION  Granted. The Opposition is correct that no specific statute is identified for the basis of the exemptions. However, it is easily identifiable that the exemption is based on section 703.530 “necessary for the support of the judgment...

DEMURRER  Opposition is late, as is the reply.  Nonetheless, the Court considers both, since the reply addressed the merits of the opposition.  However, counsel are both admonished to read what is clearly set forth at the top of the rulings...

MSJ/MSAI    No tentative to be posted until the late morning of the hearing.  Objections within the Separate Statements are not considered and won’t be ruled on. See the CRC for proper formatting of objections, 3.1354.  Likewise, argument in the...