Defendant 1101 Dove Street Owners’ Association’s motion for attorney fees on appeal is GRANTED in the total amount of $27,108. Defendant is entitled to its attorney’s fees on appeal as the prevailing party pursuant to contract under section 14.1(j) of...
Huntley vs. Kindred Hospital Westminster
Plaintiffs Huntley, et al.’s motion to compel further responses by defendant KHW to plaintiff’s RFPD, Set No. Six is CONTINUED to 3-9-17, at 2:00 p.m., in Department C-15 for hearing because plaintiffs failed to engage in a good faith meet...
Hallam vs. Micheli
Demurrer to First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) Defendants Fernando Micheli and Janice Micheli’s Demurrer to Plaintiff’s FAC is SUSTAINED in part and OVERRULED in part. Plaintiff shall have leave to file and serve an amended complaint within 14 days....
Constantin vs. Prestige Masonry & Pools, Inc.
1) Defendant Michael Duff’s motion to strike the Constantin plaintiffs’ second amended complaint as to this moving party only is GRANTED. See, C.C.P. § 436 and Taliaferro v. Davis (1963) 220 Cal.App.2d 793, 794 to 795. The Constantin plaintiffs are...
Amundson vs. Coury & Buehler Physical Therapy
The court finds the complaint is insufficient as a matter of law and will therefore treat defendant Coury and Buehler Physical Therapy’s (CBPT) motion for summary judgment/adjudication as a motion for judgment on the pleadings. (Prue v. Brady Company/San Diego,...
Swei vs. Exterior Specialist
Plaintiffs Swei, et al.’s motion to lift stay and adjudicate discovery motions is GRANTED as to lifting the stay of this civil action as to defendant Eric Martinson since his bankruptcy proceeding has been dismissed. A bankruptcy stay is automatically...
Mason vs. Tu Quang Buddist Center, Inc.
The application by plaintiff James Mason for a preliminary injunction is granted in part and denied in part. The court GRANTS plaintiff’s request for a preliminary injunction in part, and orders that Defendant Tu Quang Buddhist Center, Inc. is precluded...
Wilber vs. Nguyen
Defendants’ Request For Judicial Notice is GRANTED as to Items 1- 7, inclusive. Judicial notice of Items No. 1 and 5 is limited to the existence of, filing of, and legal effect of such pleadings, and does not include judicial...
Marton vs. The People of the State of California, acting by and through the Department of Transportation
1) Defendant City of Newport Beach’s motion to compel a further response to Form Rog. Nos. 6.4 and 6.7 by the Marton Plaintiffs is MOOT following a further meet and confer. If such further responses to these two form interrogatories...
Guzman vs. Arionus
The motion of defendants Melissa Arionus, Joshua Arionus, and Rachel Spohn for an order compelling plaintiff Nicky Guzman to appear and give testimony at deposition is DENIED without prejudice. CCP § 2025.450(a) provides that when a party deponent is served...