1.     The Court issues the following ruling on defendant Livingsocial, Inc.’s motion to stay and compel arbitration: Defendants Livingsocial, Inc.’s motion to stay and compel arbitration is denied. (See CCP § 1281.2.) Procedural unconscionability An adhesive arbitration agreement is unenforceable...

1.     The Court issues the following ruling on defendant Livingsocial, Inc.’s motion to stay and compel arbitration: Defendants Livingsocial, Inc.’s motion to stay and compel arbitration is denied. (See CCP § 1281.2.) Procedural unconscionability An adhesive arbitration agreement is unenforceable...

The Court issues the following ruling on Defendant Berry Happy, Inc., and Teda Xaygnavong’s motion to strike first amended complaint and request for CCP section 128.7 sanctions: Motion to strike plaintiff’s first amended complaint   Defendant Berry Happy, Inc., and...

The court issues the following ruling on the motion to consolidate cases of plaintiff Martha Avila: Plaintiff Martha Avila’s motion to consolidate cases is denied. Plaintiffs did not file proof that all the named defendants have been served with this...

The Court issues the following ruling on Defendants Capital Partners Services Corp. and  eCapital LLC Petition to Compel Arbitration and stay the current action:   Defendants Capital Partners Services Corp. and eCapital LLC’s petition to compel arbitration is denied. (See...

The Court issues the following ruling on defendants Stephen Hagerman, individually, and dba Genesis Realty, (collectively referred to as “Genesis”), Jose Gabriel Lujan, AR VI Asset Holdco, LLC (“Aslan”) and Fortress Construction Services, Inc. (“Fortress”) demurrers and motion to strike...

The Court issues the following ruling on defendants Stephen Hagerman, individually, and dba Genesis Realty, (collectively referred to as “Genesis”), Jose Gabriel Lujan, AR VI Asset Holdco, LLC (“Aslan”) and Fortress Construction Services, Inc. (“Fortress”) demurrers and motion to strike...

The Court issues the following ruling on plaintiff Moore Schulman & Moore, APC’s Order to Show Cause re: preliminary injunction:   Plaintiff, Moore Schulman & Moore, APC’s unopposed OSC re: motion for a preliminary injunction is granted. CCP § 526(a)....

The Court issues the following ruling on Defendant Palomar Health’s motion to strike portions of Plaintiff’s first amended complaint: Preliminary Matters / Judicial Notice   Defendant Palomar Health’s (“Palomar”) request for judicial notice is granted. The Court takes judicial notice...

The Court issues the following ruling on plaintiff Anthony G. Macaluso, an individual and as Trustee of the Macaluso Family Trust dated February 11, 1999’s Order to Show Cause re: preliminary injunction:  Plaintiff, Anthony G. Macaluso an individual and as...