TENTATIVE RULING: The Motion of Defendant Superior Paving Company for a Determination of Good Faith Settlement is GRANTED. California Code of Civil Procedure section 877.6 gives parties the right “to a hearing on the issue of the good faith...
TRUJILLO VS. GOOD VIBRATIONS FAMILY CHIROPRACTIC
TENTATIVE RULING: The Motions of Plaintiffs Elizabeth Trujillo and Jasmin Nayab to Lift the Bankruptcy Stay and for Leave to Amend the Complaint are GRANTED, in part. The Court lifts the Bankruptcy Stay for the limited purpose of ruling on...
TRUJILLO VS. GOOD VIBRATIONS FAMILY CHIROPRACTIC
TENTATIVE RULING: The Motions of Plaintiffs Elizabeth Trujillo and Jasmin Nayab to Lift the Bankruptcy Stay and for Leave to Amend the Complaint are GRANTED, in part. The Court lifts the Bankruptcy Stay for the limited purpose of ruling on...
RUSESKI VS. PENASQUITOS VILLAS HOMEOWNER’S ASSOCIATION
TENTATIVE RULING: The Court rules on Defendants’ motions as follows: Motion for Dismissal: Defendant Property Management Consultants, Inc. (“PMC”) moves for dismissal, arguing Plaintiff’s failure to re-assert any claims in his individual capacity against PMC in the First Amend...
CONSTANTINE COSS TRUSTEE OF THE COSS FAMILY TRUST VS. CORBIN
TENTATIVE RULING: The Motion of Defendant/Cross Complainant Donna Corbin and Defendants in the 2014 action Pacific Terrace Owners Association, Paul Shigley, Priscilla Urch, Tom Lee and Richard Shigley for Security is GRANTED. (Corporations Code section 800(c).) The Court finds...
RUSESKI VS. PENASQUITOS VILLAS HOMEOWNER’S ASSOCIATION
TENTATIVE RULING: The Court rules on Defendants’ motions as follows: Motion for Dismissal: Defendant Property Management Consultants, Inc. (“PMC”) moves for dismissal, arguing Plaintiff’s failure to re-assert any claims in his individual capacity against PMC in the First Amend...
CAMPBELL VS. CITY OF SAN DIEGO
TENTATIVE RULING: The Demurrers of The City of San Diego to Plaintiff Cynthia Campbell’s First Amended Complaint and Plaintiffs Matthew Pocci, Alexandria Antonio, April Antonio and Ryan Anthony Ayus’ (Plaintiffs Antonio) First Amended Complaint are SUSTAINED, without leave to amend....
SAN DIEGO CONSUMERS’ ACTION NETWORK VS LYFT INC
TENTATIVE RULING: The Court rules on Defendants’ motions as follows: Plaintiffs allege they are Lyft, Inc. customers. Through this action, Plaintiffs contend a $1.50 “Trust and Safety Fee” charged with respect to each ride obtained through the Lyft, Inc....
SROKA VS. THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO
TENTATIVE RULING: The Motion of Defendant Schilling Paradise Corporation for Determination of Good Faith Settlement is GRANTED. (CCP sections 877, 877.6) Pursuant to this case law, the effect of a determination of good faith settlement precludes all cross claims...
CHRISTOPHER JOSE RODRIGUEZ-ALCALA VS THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
TENTATIVE RULING: The Motion of Defendant The Regents of the University of California for Judgment on the Pleadings is GRANTED, without leave to amend. The Court finds for all the reasons raised by the motion plaintiffs’ claims are barred against...