California Tentative Rulings
Application for Right to Attach Plaintiff’s motion for a right to attach order is denied. Plaintiff has not met its initial burden to show that all the elements of CCP §483.010(a) apply. Therefore, it is unnecessary to consider the opposition...
SUBJECT: Application for writ of attachment If plaintiff sufficiently shows that the debt is not secured by real property, the Court will grant the instant application. PRELIMINARY COMMENTS: On Sept. 10, 2015 and Sept. 11, 2015, the Court granted plaintiff’s...
APPLICATION FOR RIGHT TO ATTACH ORDER Moving Party: Plaintiff Advance Payroll Funding. Ltd. Respondent: Defendant Langer Juice Company, Inc. POS: OK (Continued from 7/22/15) This is an action filed by Plaintiff Advance Payroll Funding, Ltd. (“APF”) against Defendant Langer Juice...
In its opposition brief, Defendant argues that Plaintiff is not entitled to the requested RAO (Attachment) because, among other things, he fails to make any showing in his moving papers that an arbitration award “may be rendered ineffectual without provisional...
1) Plaintiff Suffolk Construction’s application for a writ of attachment as to defendant Scholle Fairchild is DENIED. Plaintiff Suffolk Construction did not carry its burden of demonstrating the “probable validity” of its claim against defendant Scholle Fairchild. Plaintiff’s evidence as...
The application for right to attach order against Defendant WARP Mechanics LTD. (“Defendant”) by Plaintiff Kenneth H. Keller, as Trustee of the Keller Family Trust (“Plaintiff”) is GRANTED, for the following reasons and the Court makes the following findings: 1)...
Motion: Application for Right to Attach Order. Moving Party Plaintiff Judy Novak, trustee of the Jack A. Novak trust executed October 3, 2005. Responding Party Defendant statewide Claims Advisors, Inc. Opposition: None. Ruling: Plaintiff’s Application for Right to Attach Order...
CASE#: MSC15-00376 CASE NAME: KANDULA vs. REDSHIFT SPECIAL SET HEARING ON: APPLICATION FOR RIGHT TO ATTACH ORDER SET BY BHUMA KANDULA * TENTATIVE RULING: * Plaintiff Bhuma Kandula’s Application for Right to Attach Order and Writ of Attachment is granted. Although...
Hearing Date: August 11, 2015 Dept: M This is a collection action by an attorney against his former clients. Plaintiff seeks a writ of attachment/RTAO against each of his former clients (an entity and its principal). RTAO is sought in...
Set for hearing on Tuesday, August 11, 2015 PLAINTIFF NILS RATNATHICAM Notice Of Application And Hearing For Right To Attach Order, Order For Issuance Of Writ Of Attachment. Plaintiff Rathatnicam’s Application for Right to Attach is denied. Rathatnicam makes no...