California Tentative Rulings
Defendant Luis Dominguez’s Motion for Attorney’s Fees against plaintiff Diane Manning is granted. The court awards defendant reasonable attorneys’ fees in the sum of $43,620. Defendant’s costs are not properly the subject of this motion, since plaintiff failed to timely...
TENTATIVE RULING: The motion of defendants NAI Capital, Inc., George P. Economos, Steven G. Economos, and Geoffrey S. DeWolf for attorney’s fees is GRANTED as to plaintiff Pamela Tipton, and DENIED as to plaintiff Kenneth Tipton. Entitlement to Attorney’s Fees...
Defendants Capstone Investments, Anthony Capozza and Ann Capozza’s unopposed motion for attorney fees pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 1021 is granted. “California adheres to the American rule, ‘which provides that each party to a lawsuit must ordinarily pay...
The Motion for Award of Mandatory Attorney’s Fees and Costs of Plaintiff and Cross-Defendant, Optimalcomp, LLC, is granted. Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16 provides that a defendant prevailing on an anti-SLAPP motion “shall be entitled to recover his or...
Hearing Date: March 23, 2016 Dept: SWE ALMA SERRANO VS. KAREN PINEDA 15U12203 Motion of plaintiff Alma Serrano for attorney fees, Civil Code §1717, CRC 3.1702, CCP §§1032, 1033.5. The matter came on for hearing in Department SWE on 03.23.2016....
Motion for Attorney Fees — GRANTED Plaintiff David Weber’s Motion for Attorneys’ Fee is GRANTED. Plaintiff does not oppose an award of fees, though it does contest the amount. The Court’s calculations begin with the detailed identification of the fees...
Defendant Rudolph & Sletten, Inc.’s motion for CC § 1717 attorneys’ fees is granted in part. Rudolph & Sletten’s motion for CC § 1717 costs is granted in part. In addition to the original moving, opposing and reply papers, the...
Denied. Defendants bring this Motion based on a contractual attorney’s fee provision in the Note and Deed of Trust. As to the Note, the provision for attorneys’ fees provides for their recovery only upon acceleration of the Note; Defendants have...
Tentative Ruling on Motion for Anti-SLAPP Attorneys’ Fees Nguyen v. Qualcomm, Case No. 2015-04028 Special Motion to Strike Decided: August 14, 2015 Current Hearing Date: Jan. 8, 2016, 1:30 p.m., Dept. 72 1. Overview and Procedural Posture. Plaintiff Quan...
Special Motion by Defendants Howard Labe and Jill Nakamura to Strike Plaintiff’s [First Amended] Complaint Pursuant to CCP Section 425.16 Plaintiff John Calhoun lives in real property located at 115 Tait Avenue in Los Gatos. (First Amended Complaint (“FAC”), ¶6.) ...