KIM vs. AIKEN

Case Number: Orange County 30-2011-00510585
Hearing Date: June 30, 2015
County: Orange County
Judicial Officer: McEachen
Tags:
Word Count: 98

 

Claimant has not met her burden and has not even asserted expenses (reasonably necessary or not) which would entitle her to exempt any more than the automatic 75% exemption. Therefore, the Court finds that Claimant’s earnings are not exempt. So...

Membership required to view FULL tentative ruling.
Log In Register today!