Defendant seeks an Order compelling Plaintiff CBIZ to produce documents responsive to RFP, Set No. Two, Nos. 39, 40, 41, and 42 and further responses to Special Interrogatory, Set No. Two, Nos. 19-23; and request for sanctions against Plaintiff CBIZ...
Buie v. Surf City Auto Group, Inc.
Defendant seeks an order compelling Plaintiff to submit to binding contractual arbitration and stay all proceedings before this Court. The Court finds that Defendant has demonstrated the existence of an arbitration agreement between itself and Plaintiff. However, Plaintiff generally contends...
VMA Harbor Place, LLC v. KB Group Investments, LLC
Plaintiffs seek an Order to Show Cause re: contempt for violation of Preliminary Injunction. The elements of contempt are: (1) a valid order in existence; (2) knowledge of the order; (3) ability to comply with the order; and (4) a...
Calculated Risk Analytics, LLC v. Parman
Cross-Defendant, Calculated Risk Analytics seeks a Motion for Protective Order The Court signed the stipulated protective order on 3-9-2021, four days after the motion was filed. Consequently, the motion is moot. The only issue is sanctions. It is difficult to...
Tran vs. Nguyen
1. Defendants, Hoang Thi Hue and Que Phung This Nguyen’ Demurrer to Amended Complaint 2. Defendants Bruce Tran and Donna Tran’s Motion to Transfer/Reassign FAC Third Cause of Action TENTATIVE RULING: Motion No. 1: Defendants’ Demurrer to the First Amend Complaint is SUSTAINED...
Pro Water Damage Inc. vs. 360 Construction Group, Inc.
Plaintiff/Cross Defendant’s Demurrer to Cross-Complaint TENTATIVE RULING: Demurrer to the Cross-Complaint Cross-Defendant Pro Water Damage, Inc., demurs to the Cross-Complaint of Cross-Complainant NARM Corporation. For the following reasons, the demurrer is sustained with 15 days leave to amend. The court...
DSXW Holdings, Inc. v. L’Inc D’Aline Corporation
Plaintiff prevailed in this action, thus, the Plaintiff is entitled to recover reasonable attorney fees from the Defendant, pursuant to the contractual fee provision found in the parties’ lease agreement. (Civil Code § 1717(a), (b)(1); see Stokus v. Marsh (1990)...
Hanley v. Loyd
The Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED The moving papers seem to switch the numbering of the causes of action, by referring to the 1st cause of action in the Complaint, which is for Negligence, as the third cause of...
Shiokari VS Shiokari
The Court DENIES David Shiokari’s Motion to strike the entirety of Plaintiffs’ memorandum of costs. The Court PARTLY GRANTS AND PARTLY DENIES, the Motion to tax the challenged costs, as set forth below. Judicial notice is taken of the records...
Gonzalez VS Xia
Motion to Strike: The Motion to Strike brought by Cross-Defendants Seven Gables Real Estate Group, Inc. and James Jekums is DENIED with respect to ¶42 of the Cross-Complaint (included within the second cause of action) and ¶4 of the Prayer. The Motion...