California Tentative Rulings
Cross-Defendant, Calculated Risk Analytics seeks a Motion for Protective Order The Court signed the stipulated protective order on 3-9-2021, four days after the motion was filed. Consequently, the motion is moot. The only issue is sanctions. It is difficult to...
Before the Court at present are: (1) the Ex Parte Application for an Order to Show Cause Regarding Contempt of Court and Contempt Sanctions Against Plaintiff, filed by The Regents of The University of California (“Regents”) on 12/31/20; (2) the...
1. Motion by Defendant Richard Keller for Protective Order (C.C.P. § 2030.060): 2. Motion by Defendant Richard Keller for Protective Order (C.C.P. § 2031.060): Defendants Richard Keller’s Motion For Protective Orders as to Discovery Directed to Quicken Loans, Inc. are...
Defendants Pegah Fazeli and Farinoush Ghaneian seek a protective order limiting the number of depositions to be taken of them in their varying capacities, and limiting the time for said depositions in this matter. Defendants contend that a protective order...
Plaintiff Mila Gallen’s Motion for Protective Order Plaintiff Mila Gallen moves for a protective order placing various restrictions on Defendant Kevin Shearer’s physical examination of Plaintiff pursuant to California Civil Procedure Code § 2032.220. For the following reasons, Plaintiff’s motion...
Plaintiff Vitec Electronics Corp.’s Motion to Determine Privilege Claim Plaintiff Vitec Electronics Corp. moves pursuant to California Civil Procedure Code § 2031.285(d)(1) for a determination of a privilege claim by Defendants Veris Industries, LLC, Schneider Electric USA, Inc., and Pacific...
Defendants Vido Artukovich & Son, Inc., Vidmar, Inc. ,and Mark Artukovich’s Motions for Protective Order and for Sanctions Defendants Vido Artukovich & Son, Inc., Vidmar, Inc., and Mark Artukovich’s move for a protective order preventing the oral deposition of Mark...
(1) Motion for Protective Order Defendant’s request for a protective order preventing Plaintiff from obtaining privileged portions of Nicole Miller & Associates’ (hereinafter “Miller”) investigation, specifically the investigative report, investigative summary, and Miller’s summary of interviews with witnesses, is GRANTED....
Defendants’ Motion to File Under Seal Documents in Support of Defendant Jay Kanner’s Motion for Summary Judgment or, In The Alternative, Summary Adjudication According to the moving party, other than the Deposit Schedule, which arguably contains the financial information of...
Nature of Proceeding: Motion for Protective Order Filed By: Lambert, Kristina O. Defendant Ford’s Motion for Protective Order is ruled upon as follows. This Court has previously addressed on multiple occasions each of Ford’s arguments regarding protective orders for...