California Tentative Rulings
Defendants AT&T Mobility, LLC and Christian Vincent Morelli move for summary judgment in their favor on the complaint by Plaintiff Arzu. In the alternative, they seek summary adjudication of twelve issues, which mostly correspond to the ten causes of action...
Motion for Summary Judgment/Adjudication Defendant Frances Elizabeth Andersen seeks summary judgment or adjudication as to 3 issues relating to the First Amended Complaint filed on 5/13/16 by Plaintiff Jon Steven Andersen. Issue 1: Whether the 1st cause of action for...
Defendant and Cross-Complainant Lenora Schroeder moves for summary adjudication of the Second, Third, Fourth, and Fifth causes of action in her Cross-Complaint against Cross-Defendants Vanessa Butker and K. Koukladas, individually and as trustee of the MAAKK Family Trust dated December...
Plaintiff Erin Vargas seeks an order striking and/or taxing the Memorandum of Costs filed by Defendants Michael Walker and Christine Walker. Plaintiff argues first that Defendants are not entitled to costs pursuant to their Code of Civil Procedure §998 offer...
Plaintiff Russell Standard moves for an order quashing the deposition subpoenas served by defendant on Dr. Lee Gislason, Dr. Cat Dang, Dr. Kevin Kinback, Dr. Rustin Berlow, Dr. Paul Rosenblit, Dr. Renato Monaco, and Netta Halpern, LMFT. Plaintiff also seeks...
Trabuco Highlands Community Association’s Motion for Summary Judgment/Adjudication Defendant Trabuco Highlands Community Association moves for summary judgment as to the Second Amended Complaint of Plaintiff Jennifer Loeffler. In the alternative, Defendant moves for summary adjudication of 13 issues. The SAC...
Defendant the City of Laguna Beach moves for summary judgment or adjudication as to the first cause of action for dangerous condition of public property in the First Amended Complaint filed on 3/13/17 by Plaintiff Lauren Esparza. It is undisputed...
Defendants Kathy Massoumi, D.D.S. and Kathy Massoumi, D.D.S., Inc. (collectively, “defendants”) seek an order from the Court compelling Plaintiff to provide verified responses, without objections, to Special Interrogatories, Sets Three and Four, which were propounded upon Plaintiff on 03/26/18 and...
Defendant Lacy Construction, seeks an award of attorney’s fees against Plaintiff GXP Consultants Alliance, Inc. (“GXP”) based on section 8.9 of the GXP Alliance Agreement. The fee provision in question states as follows: “The prevailing party in any arbitration or...
Cross-defendant Patrick Joseph Eccles dba PJE Construction (“PJE”) asks the Court to determine that the settlement reached between he, Plaintiffs William A. Pond and Michaela Pond, and Defendant/Cross-Complainants Hayden Development, Inc. and Kyle C. Hayden are in good faith. On...