motion to quash service of summons and complaint for lack of jurisdiction
Shim v Park
Motion to Quash Subpoena serve on Facebook (privacy and the Stored Communications Act), sanctions imposed
Reverditto v. Reverditto
Moving Party/Defendants, Tony Reverditto and John Begin’s Motion to Quash Service and Set Aside Default The motion filed by defendants Anthony Reverditto and John Begin to quash service of summons and vacate default is GRANTED. “When a defendant challenges the...
Rusfighters, LLC vs. Minakov
he hearing on the Motion to Quash Service of Summons for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction, filed by Specially Appearing Defendant Ali Abdelaziz (“MP”) is continued to September October 4, 2019. Plaintiff has requested an opportunity to pursue discovery on the...
Dowell vs. Target
Plaintiff Amy Dowell moves the court for an order quashing the deposition notice of non-party witness Karim Abdollahi, M.D. The motion is brought pursuant to California Rule of Court 3.1010(a), and Code of Civil Procedure §§2025.240 & 2025.270, because Plaintiff...
SANDERS VS. PEACOCK
1.MOTION TO QUASH SUBPOENA Plaintiff Ruby Sanders’ Motion for an order to Quash Defendant’s Subpoena to Dr. Cuthbert is Granted but only such that the challenged subpoena is limited to records from November 5, 2005 to the present. Plaintiff’s request...
Howard v. Lazatin
The Defendants Janet Lazatin and Ronald Lazatin’s Motion to Quash the service of the Summons is GRANTED. The Summons that Plaintiff obtained and that was filed in this action on or about August 1, 2018 appears to have been obtained...
Standard vs. Costco Wholesale Corporation
Plaintiff Russell Standard moves for an order quashing the deposition subpoenas served by defendant on Dr. Lee Gislason, Dr. Cat Dang, Dr. Kevin Kinback, Dr. Rustin Berlow, Dr. Paul Rosenblit, Dr. Renato Monaco, and Netta Halpern, LMFT. Plaintiff also seeks...
Dane Elec Corp. USA vs. Hassan
Specially Appearing Cross-Defendant Michael Wang’s motion for an order quashing service of defendant/cross-complainant Michel Hassan’s Summons and Cross-Complaint is DENIED. Service by mail is appropriate for serving a summons and complaint. CCP §§413.10(c), 415.30(a), 415.40. However, service is only proper...
DUFF VS SIMON PROPERTY GROUP
(1) Motion to Quash Subpoena. Plaintiff Jamie Duff’s Motion to Quash Subpoena to Apple, Inc. is denied. Code Civ. Proc., § 1987.1. The Retail Property Trust’s subpoena seeks to depose the PMQ from Apple, Plaintiff’s employer (current and at the...