The Motion by Defendant/Cross-Defendant George C. Hopkins Construction Co, Inc. to Compel Further Responses from Defendant/Cross-Complainant Hardrock Management Corporation to Form Interrogatories-Construction Litigation (Set Two) is GRANTED. Each answer in the response to an interrogatory must be “as complete and...
Organista vs. Northgate Gonzalez, LLC
The Motion by Plaintiff Estela Organista to compel Defendant to provide further responses to Plaintiff’s Form Interrogatories, Special Interrogatories, Requests for Production, and Requests for Admission is granted in part and denied in part. The motion is granted as to...
Dowell vs. Target
Plaintiff Amy Dowell moves the court for an order quashing the deposition notice of non-party witness Karim Abdollahi, M.D. The motion is brought pursuant to California Rule of Court 3.1010(a), and Code of Civil Procedure §§2025.240 & 2025.270, because Plaintiff...
Mandre vs. Microsoft
he “Motion to Compel & Sanctions” filed by Plaintiff Ahmed Mandre is DENIED. No proof of service for the Motion has been submitted. Nor does it include the required meet and confer declaration. (See C.C.P. § 2016.040 and 2031.310(b)(2).) The...
Lazo v. Keller
1. Motion by Defendant Richard Keller for Protective Order (C.C.P. § 2030.060): 2. Motion by Defendant Richard Keller for Protective Order (C.C.P. § 2031.060): Defendants Richard Keller’s Motion For Protective Orders as to Discovery Directed to Quicken Loans, Inc. are...
Navaei vs. Orange County Social Services Agency
Plaintiff Mina Navaei’s motion to reopen discovery for all purposes is denied. Law Generally, discovery must be completed 30 days “before the date initially set for the trial of the action.” Code Civ. Proc., § 2024.020(a). “Except as provided in...
Thomas vs. Allied Universal
Defendant Allied Universal’s motion to withdraw or amend deemed admissions as to plaintiffs Vanessa Thomas, et al., pursuant to C.C.P. § 2033.300(a), is DENIED. Defendant’s motion is in response to the Court’s November 5, 2018 Minutes Order (“11/5/18 Order”), which...
Puga vs. Novus Dia, LLC
Defendants Warren Hennagin and Glenn M. Gelman & Associates move to compel non-party Tamborelli Law Group to provide further responses to certain categories of documents requested in Defendants’ business records subpoena served on 7/12/18. (Akinmurele Decl. at ¶ 5, Ex....
Custom Goods, LLC v. Karma Automotive, LLC
Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Further Responses to Form Interrogatories Set One, numbers 12.1 to 12.4, 12.6 and 15.1 is GRANTED. Defendant must provide verified further responses by no later than January 18, 2019. Plaintiff is awarded $1,260 in discovery sanctions...
Anthony Ferro v. John Petrov
Los Angeles Superior Court – Pomona – Dept. J (Judge Dan Oki) MOTION TO COMPEL ORDERED RESPONSES TO REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION, SET ONE Moving Parties: Plaintiff Anthony Ferro Respondent: Defendants JPM Industries, Inc. dba Baldwin Construction POS: Moving OK; Opposing...