Motion: (1)-(2) Motions to Quash Deposition Subpoenas (3) Motion for Protective Order (4) Motions to Compel Depositions Moving Party: (1), (3) Defendants NBC Subsidiary (KNBC-TV) LLC and NBCUniversal Media, LLC (2) Non-Party Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP (4) Plaintiff Frank...
BONILLA vs. BMW
Counsel for plaintiffs: Mark Romano; Timothy Whelan (Romano, etc.) Counsel for defendant BMW of North America, LLC: Kate Lehrman; Jacqueline Bruce Chinery (Lehrman, etc.) Motion for Protective Order Upholding Defendant’s Redaction of Portions of Audit of South Bay BMW’s Participation...
Belonia v. Ford Motor Company
This is a lemon law case. Plaintiff Rosanida Belonia (“Plaintiff”) filed a complaint against defendant Ford Motor Company (“Defendant” or “Ford”) asserting causes of action for violation of the Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act and the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act. On March...
Tran vs. Pennymac Corporation
Motion to Quash Subpoena Tentative Ruling: Defendant PennyMac Corp’s unopposed Motion to Quash Notices to Appear at Trial and for a Protective Order is granted. (See Liberty Mutual Ins. Co. v. Superior Court (1992) 10 Cal.App.4th 1282.) Plaintiff failed to establish good cause for their...
K.V. v. LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
Dept: 310 K.V. v. LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT A. MOTION TO COMPEL LAUSD TO FURTHER RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S FIRST SET OF REQUESTS FOR ADMISSIONS AND REQUEST FOR MONETARY SANCTIONS IN THE AMOUNT OFF $7,525 TENTATIVE RULING Deny motion in...
RUZANNA KAZARYAN v. MERCEDES-BENZ USA LLC
Dept: 46 Motion for Protective Order NOTICE OF ONLINE POSTING AND TELEPHONIC SUBMISSION This ruling and the CMC order are posted on-line. No appearance is necessary if, after meeting and conferring regarding the tentative ruling, the parties both agree to...
CHRISTINA M SAGONOWSKY VS. CHRISTINE TOUR-SARKISSIAN
DEFENDANT CHRISTINE TOUR-SARKISSIAN, PHIL FOSTER, ABIGAIL MORRIS, PAUL TOUR-SARKISSIAN, TOUR-SARKISSIAN LAW OFFICES’ Motion For Protective Order And Request For Monetary Sanction Against Plaintiff Christina Sagonowsky. The motion for protective order and sanctions is granted. The court adopts Defendant’s suggestion that...
Grail Semiconductor, Inc. v. Mitsubishi USA, Inc.
Factual and Procedural Background In June 2007, plaintiff Grail Semiconductor, Inc. (“Grail”) filed an action against defendant Mitsubishi Electric & Electronics USA, Inc. (“MEUS”) alleging breach of a non-disclosure agreement that the parties entered into. After trial, the jury...
Professional Healthcare at Home, LLC v. Healthy Living at Home, Inc., et al.
Currently before the Court are the following motions: (1) a motion for a protective order postponing the depositions of defendant Scott Lobdell (“Lobdell”), Caroline Breeding (“Breeding”), Amber Green (“Green”), Tera Cummings (“Cummings”), Don Beaudoin (“Beaudoin”), Bryan Finch (“Finch”), Jana Root...
BURCHAM VS. FORD MOTOR COMPANY
The Motion (ROA # 41) of Defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY (“Defendant” or “Ford”) for a Protective Order to prevent Plaintiff JULIE BURCHAM (“Plaintiff”) and her counsel from disclosing and / or disseminating Ford’s confidential, proprietary and/or trade secret business information...